Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Sorrels & Choudhury on Confidentiality Provisions and § 104(a)(2)

Randall O. Sorrels (President, Houston Bar Association) & Neel Choudhury have published Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Beware: Little Known Tax Consequences Associated with Confidentiality Provisions, 6 Hous. Bus. & Tax J. 257 (2006).  Here is part of the Introduction:

This paper is designed to provide an in-depth look at the current issue of taxing proceeds from personal injury settlement agreements that are attributable to confidentiality provisions and suggests ways to either avoid or minimize the adverse risks such taxation can have on plaintiffs receiving those proceeds. Section II of this paper discusses the general rules and requirements for Internal Revenue Code § 104(a)(2) exclusions of settlement proceeds stemming from physical personal injury or sickness. Section III provides a detailed analysis of the Amos case, which is the seminal case regarding taxation of confidentiality provisions in personal injury settlements. Finally, Section IV suggests an array of techniques that can be used to either eliminate tax concerns stemming from confidentiality provisions or at least minimize their adverse effects on the plaintiff’s settlement proceeds.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading