Following up on my recent posts on the declining influence of law reviews on courts (here and here): Blake K. Rohrbacher (Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE) has posted an interesting paper on SSRN:  Twenty-Five Years of Student Scholarship in Judicial Opinions.  Here is the abstract:

This paper examines patterns in judicial citation of student notes. The paper discusses a data set of opinions citing notes written in the last twenty-five years (roughly 4000 unique note citations), from all levels of U.S. courts, including data on the location, level, and nature (state or federal) of each court citing each note, as well as the years in which each note was cited. These data allow detailed analysis of citation patterns and provide a way to measure, albeit indirectly, the influence of student scholarship on judicial common-lawmaking. The paper first presents data regarding the most-cited individual notes. Then, the paper examines the journals that garnered the most citations to notes published in those journals. Finally, the paper discusses various citation patterns, including a breakdown of court characteristics and their relationship to note citations, the trend of decreasing note citations over time, and the effect of recency of publication on note citation. Finally, the paper presents data on the states and courts that most cite student notes.

Here are the twenty law reviews whose student notes are cited most often by courts:

1. Harvard Law Review
2. Yale Law Journal
3. Columbia Law Review
4. Fordham Law Review
5. Cornell Law Review
6. NYU Law Review
7. Duke Law Journal
8. Virginia Law Review
9. Stanford Law Review
10. Michigan Law Review
11. Georgetown Law Journal
12. Texas Law Review
13. William Mitchell Law Review
14. Iowa Law Review
15. Washington & Lee Law Review
16. Washburn Law Journal
17. St. John’s Law Review
18. University of Chicago Law Review
19. Hofstra Law Review
20. Notre Dame Law Review