Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Tax Shaming Doesn’t Work

From the Big Fat Finance Blog:  Oh, the Shame Of It:

A public pillory is certainly a dramatic form of punishment. But how effective is it?

The question was on my mind this week as I paged through the State of California’s annual list of individual and corporate taxpayers with the largest delinquent income tax bills [blogged here, here, and here] …

But celebrities are not the only ones being put through the wringer, and California isn’t the only state playing the shame game. More and more jurisdictions are using shame as a way to get businesses to cough up overdue tax payments. …

Nearly one-third of the states run this kind of shaming program, according to a new research paper from Joshua D. Blank, assistant professor of law at Rutgers School of Law-Newark [What's Wrong With Shaming Corporate Tax Abuse, 62 Tax L. Rev. ___ (2009)]. More worrying, though, for many businesses — especially larger organizations — is the fact that from time to time, federal lawmakers show signs of wanting to jump on the bandwagon. In 2004, for example, the Senate passed legislation that would have required the IRS to publish the names of companies that participated in tax shelters.

That particular law went nowhere (which is not to say that it couldn’t raise its head again.) And that’s just as well, argues Blank, for one simple reason: Shaming doesn’t work.

Or at least it doesn’t work for the type of corporate tax abuse that the federal lawmakers were targeting. In cases of blatant nonpayment of taxes or violation of clear tax rules, public outrage may indeed be strong enough to produce the kind of success that Minnesota has achieved. But in cases that involve massive complexity, mounds of tedious detail, and abstruse argumentation about tax standards — the virtual hallmarks of corporate tax shelters — public reaction may not amount to much more than a shrug. Shaming sanctions, says Blank, “would be unlikely to inflict significant reputational harm on corporate offenders, and, as a result, their deterrence value would be weak.”

Indeed, the shame ploy might backfire. “Short-term investors like hedge and private equity funds may be attracted to, rather than repelled by, corporations with tax directors who claim tax positions that push the envelope,” notes Blank.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading