Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

A Dissenting View on Lantz

Following up on yesterday's post, 7th Cir. Reverses Tax Court, Upholds 2-Year Deadline on Innocent Spouse ClaimsA. Lavar Taylor, Adjunct Professor at Chapman and Director of the Center for the Fair Administration of Taxes ("CFAT"), passed along this amicus brief he filed in support of the taxpayer's position:

Amicus urges the Court to affirm the ruling the Tax Court and further urges the Court to expressly hold that the statutory language of § 6015(f) precludes the Commissioner’s use of the two year rule set forth in Treas. Reg. § 1.6015-5(b) and instead requires the Commissioner to consider all the facts and circumstances (including the amount of time that has elapsed between the commencement of collection activity and the submission of the request for relief under § 6015(f)) in deciding whether to grant a request for relief under § 6015(f).


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading