Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Tax Foundation Gives F Grade to CRS Report on Tax Rates and Economic Growth

CRS LogoTax Foundation:  CRS Study on Tax Rates and Growth Still
Flunks the Test
, by Stephen J. Entin:

Studies issued by the Congressional Research Service are intended to inform the Congress as it develops
public policy and enacts legislation. A recent CRS publication on the effect of the top statutory tax rates on
economic activity [Taxes and the Economy: An Economic Analysis of the Top Tax Rates Since 1945] may have influenced the debate over taxing the rich during the election and may have
influenced the tax changes just enacted in the fiscal cliff legislation.

It is critical that such studies reflect the best guidance that the economics and tax professions can provide.
The CRS study on the top tax rates did not meet that high standard. Its original release in the fall was met
with widespread and justified disbelief, and it was withdrawn for review and examination of its
methodology. It has now been reissued in an updated form. However, the re-issued CRS study does not
contain any changes of note that would redeem the original report. 

The paper purports to determine the link (or lack thereof) between changes in the top marginal tax rates on
income and capital gains and the growth rate of the economy. Unfortunately, the method used to determine
the relationship depends mainly on timing, looking to see if a change in the growth rate of the economy
coincides with or follows soon after a rise or fall in the tax rates. The study makes no effort to determine the
channels through which the tax changes ought to work to affect the economy, looks at the wrong measure of
progress over the wrong time frame, and takes inadequate account of what other tax or economic events are
occurring at the same time that might mask the results. …

The CRS study omits important variables and poisons its results by not holding other factors constant. The
variables it does examine are indirectly related to the relationship one should be studying, but the study does not follow them for long enough to get the whole picture. The study is as weak now as it was when it was
first issued. Grade: F.

Prior TaxProf Blog posts:


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog