Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Solan: Solve the Law School Crisis by Paying Associates Less

Huffington Post op-ed:  Pay Associates Less? A Novel Response to a Rapidly Changing Legal Market, by
Lawrence M. Solan (Brooklyn):

Legal education is said to be in crisis. Law school applications are
down sharply as prospective law students question whether the high cost
of legal education is worth it. A good part of the declining interest
results from the loss of entry-level jobs at large law firms, which
typically pay salaries high enough to offset post-graduation debt.

As firms complain that recent graduates are inadequately trained in
the practical aspects of lawyering, law schools, including my own law
school, are implementing various forms of experiential learning, ranging
from in-house clinics to enhanced externship opportunities to the
equivalent of full-year apprenticeship programs. While law schools
should continue training lawyers to hit the ground running, these moves
respond to only a small part of a larger problem.

Much of what is driving the diminution in opportunities for law
school graduates at elite law firms is the fact that business clients
have become less willing to pay high hourly rates for teams of novices. …

The crucial question facing both legal educators and the
legal profession, then, is how to get newly minted lawyers through the
first couple of years so that they gain enough knowledge and experience
to become “adult lawyers” capable of producing high professional caliber
work.

Here is a simple proposal to address at least part of the problem: If
clients are not willing to pay top dollar for the work of inexperienced
associates, hire the associates at lower salaries, and give them
substantial raises as their value increases…

Why not cut associate pay in the early years? For example, offer them
$75,000, $125,000 and $175,000 for the first three years, respectively.
This salary cut will permit firms to continue to train the next
generation of elite lawyers in substantial numbers, while shifting some
of the cost of training its most junior associates from the clients to
the trainees themselves. Moreover, although large firms face pressure to
remain competitive, the promise of these substantial raises should be a
significant enticement to attract the best talent. Finally, savvy
business clients will respect and choose firms that honestly link
compensation to the realities of the market.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading