Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

ABA Says JD-Next Is Not Yet A ‘Valid And Reliable’ Predictor Of Grades; Law Schools Need A Variance To Use It

Reuters, ABA Says Law Schools Still Need Approval for Alternative Admissions Program:

ABA Legal Ed (2023)The American Bar Association on Thursday declined to grant full approval to JD-Next, rejecting a proposal to put the alternative law school admissions program on par with the LSAT and the GRE.

The ABA's Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar instead approved a recommendation from its standards committee that the JD-Next program should not yet be deemed a "valid and reliable" predictor of an applicant's law school grades.

The decision maintains the status quo, under which law school admissions offices must seek special ABA permission to use the JD-Next program to admit new students.

48 law schools have received ABA variances for the use of JD-Next in admissions.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading