Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Supreme Court Grants Cert Petition Authored By Pepperdine Religious Liberty Clinic Director And Alum

Pepperdine Surf Report, Cert Petition Authored by Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Religious Liberty Clinic Director Eric Rassbach and Pepperdine Caruso Law Alumnus Colten Stanberry (JD '19) Granted by Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Current)New York Times, Supreme Court to Hear Catholic Charity’s Bid for Tax Exemption:

The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether Wisconsin was free to deny a tax exemption to a Catholic charity on the grounds that its activities were not primarily religious.

The court has been notably receptive to arguments from religious groups, and the new case will give the justices another opportunity to explore the limits of the First Amendment’s protection of religious liberty.

The case concerns a Wisconsin law that exempts religious groups from state unemployment taxes so long as they are “operated primarily for religious purposes.”

Catholic Charities Bureau, the social ministry of the Catholic Diocese in Superior, Wis., has said its mission is to provide “services to the poor and disadvantaged as an expression of the social ministry of the Catholic Church.” State officials determined that the charity did not qualify for the exemption because it “provides essentially secular services and engages in activities that are not religious per se.”

The Wisconsin Supreme Court said it accepted the charity’s contention that its services were “based on Gospel values and the principles of the Catholic social teachings.” But the court ruled that the group’s activities were “primarily charitable and secular” and did not “attempt to imbue program participants with the Catholic faith nor supply any religious materials to program participants or employees.”

The court added that “both employment with the organizations and services offered by the organizations are open to all participants regardless of religion.”

Eric Rassbach, a lawyer with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which represents the charity, questioned that reasoning. “Wisconsin is trying to make sure no good deed goes unpunished,” he said in a statement Friday. “Penalizing Catholic Charities for serving Catholics and non-Catholics alike is ridiculous and wrong.”

The charity asked the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in, saying that the Constitution does not allow the government “to second-guess the religious decisions of religious bodies.”

Editor's Note:  If you would like to receive a daily email with links to legal education posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading