Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

California Bar Orders Investigation Of February Exam Disaster As Beleaguered Test-Takers Fume

ABA Journal, Furious Bar Candidates Square Off With State Bar of California in Wake of Flubbed Exam:

California Bar (2021)For two hours, February bar candidates unleashed their fury about the chaos surrounding last week’s administration of California’s new bar exam and demanded remediation, including an offer of provisional licenses, a lowering of the pass score and automatic passage during a March 5 meeting of the State Bar of California Board of Trustees.

Testimonies from examinees detailed delayed start times, rude proctors, technical glitches, grammatical and factual errors in the questions, rampant cheating, and a host of distractions—including proctors arguing and fellow test-takers screaming out of frustration. More than 90 test takers spoke ….

Reuters, California Bar Approves Bar Exam Probe as Angry Test Takers Sound Off:

The State Bar of California on Wednesday launched an independent investigation of its February bar exam, a newly created test that was marred by widespread technical and logistical problems.

The state bar’s board of trustees approved the retention of an outside investigator following two hours of public comment from bar examinees who expressed frustration and anger over the faulty rollout of the state’s new exam.

The Recorder, Remedies for Botched Bar Exam? Not So Fast, State Bar Says:

In their first meeting since last week’s bar exam meltdown, California bar leaders said applicants will have to wait for a testing expert to review the results before deciding if a lower passing score or a scoring boost is justified.

Law360, California Bar Orders Investigation Of Flawed Exam:

“We don’t go into this exam certain that we’re going to pass, but we do go into the exam trusting that the state bar will provide us with a fair shot to pass,” one applicant told the board Wednesday. “The bar placed financial desires above the importance of upholding the integrity of a high-stakes exam; it recklessly disregarded the time, money and preparation applicants pour into this exam; and allowed applicants to endure two days plagued with foreseeable technical and procedural issues and one comment on remedial measures.”

Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:

Editor’s Note:  If you would like to receive a daily email with links to legal education posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading