Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Preview Of The 2026-27 U.S. News Law School Rankings: Employment

Following up on my previous posts this week: 

Today, following up on last week’s post, Law School Rankings By 10-Month Employment Rate (2024), this post projects next year’s 2026-27 U.S. News employment ranking using the current methodology:

Outcomes 10 months after graduation (weighted 33%): This measures the extent to which graduates obtain the most in-demand jobs – namely those that are long term, full time and requiring (or taking advantage of) bar passage. Maximum credit was assigned for graduates with school-funded fellowships – as long as those fellowships were otherwise full-time, long-term jobs in which bar passage was required or the J.D. degree was an advantage. Maximum credit was assigned to law school graduates pursuing additional graduate studies.

This indicator was derived from the average of the 2022 and 2023 graduating class outcomes 10 months after graduation. Specifically, U.S. News took a nonweighted average by aggregating the score it previously computed from the 2022 graduating class with the newly calculated 2023 class score, then divided it by two.

For information purposes, U.S. News published in the rankings section of profiles a 10-months-after-graduation employment percentage outcome that equals the proportion of 2023 graduates in all the job types that U.S. News weighs 100% for the purpose of calculating a weighted average in the 10-month employment ranking indicator. However, the actual value used in the rankings is an index that also awards partial credit for other outcomes values, and is described below. As previously stated, U.S. News used data for two graduating classes only in the ranking calculations.

These partially weighted jobs that were some combination of particular factors, namely short term and part time, in many cases were funded by the law school and/or not utilizing bar passage received less credit by varying amounts, determined by an allocation of some or all of these factors.

Law schools are required to report these highly differentiated outcome measures each year to the ABA. For a more detailed explanation, see Notes on Employment Rates below.

Below is next year’s projected 2026-27 U.S. News ranking of the 10-month “maximum employment” of the classes of 2023 and 2024. For comparison, the current 2025-26 U.S. News ranking of the 10-month “maximum employment” of the classes of 2022 and 2023 are also included.

Rank School 2026-2027 Employment 2025-2026 Employment 2025-2026 Employment Rank
1 Texas A&M 100.00% 99.71% 1
2 Washington Univ. 99.82% 98.90% 4
3 Virginia 98.98% 99.19% 2
4 Penn 98.98% 99.03% 3
5 North Carolina 98.97% 98.15% 9
6 Wake Forest 98.79% 98.20% 7
7 SMU 98.70% 98.20% 6
8 Chicago 98.56% 97.91% 10
9 George Washington 98.45% 93.83% 38
10 Duke 98.41% 98.48% 5
11 Vanderbilt 98.10% 96.19% 22
12 Northwestern 97.99% 98.17% 8
13 Michigan 97.78% 97.48% 12
14 Baylor 97.65% 94.77% 35
15 Washington & Lee 97.65% 96.53% 20
16 NYU 97.59% 97.37% 13
17 George Mason 97.38% 96.68% 18
18 Iowa 97.37% 97.26% 14
19 UCLA 97.11% 97.11% 15
20 Cornell 97.00% 95.31% 33
21 Boston Univ. 96.99% 96.38% 21
22 Columbia 96.93% 97.51% 11
23 Pepperdine 96.92% 92.86% 50
24 Florida State 96.84% 96.59% 19
25 Stanford 96.81% 95.43% 31
26 Wisconsin 96.70% 95.14% 34
27 Boston College 96.65% 95.65% 30
28 Kentucky 96.62% 95.74% 27
29 Texas 96.62% 95.77% 26
30 Florida 96.22% 95.43% 32
31 San Diego 96.09% 93.22% 47
32 UC-Berkeley 96.02% 94.37% 37
33 Notre Dame 95.97% 95.91% 24
34 Minnesota 95.71% 96.83% 17
35 Wayne State 95.55% 93.34% 45
36 Montana 95.51% 90.12% 81
37 Harvard 95.50% 95.70% 28
38 Missouri-Columbia 95.28% 92.22% 60
39 Georgetown 95.24% 95.78% 25
40 Yale 95.21% 97.06% 16
41 Georgia 94.75% 96.10% 23
42 UC-Irvine 94.72% 93.15% 48
43 Alabama 94.64% 95.67% 29
44 Emory 94.56% 92.35% 56
45 Kansas 94.42% 93.08% 49
46 SUNY-Buffalo 94.31% 89.35% 88
47 South Dakota 94.08% 88.98% 93
48 BYU 93.97% 91.59% 66
49 Fordham 93.85% 93.35% 44
50 St. John’s 93.82% 93.78% 39

Rank School 2026-2027 Employment 2025-2026 Employment 2025-2026 Employment Rank
51 Temple 93.79% 92.49% 54
52 Illinois 93.75% 91.64% 65
53 USC 93.51% 93.38% 43
54 South Carolina 93.50% 92.44% 55
55 Villanova 93.18% 92.64% 53
56 Penn State 93.17% 93.62% 40
57 Nebraska 93.15% 92.86% 51
58 Marquette 93.04% 91.99% 63
59 Utah 92.79% 94.57% 36
60 Catholic 92.76% 92.24% 58
61 Houston 92.74% 88.80% 97
62 Stetson 92.64% 91.12% 70
63 Arizona State 92.60% 91.52% 67
64 Loyola-Chicago 92.49% 87.81% 103
65 Drexel 92.38% 93.52% 41
66 Ohio State 92.24% 93.23% 46
67 Duquesne 92.16% 90.17% 80
68 UC-Davis 92.16% 92.83% 52
69 William & Mary 92.16% 91.39% 68
70 Tulsa 92.13% 88.28% 101
71 Washburn 91.95% 86.18% 117
72 Oklahoma 91.95% 92.24% 59
73 Mercer 91.72% 88.83% 95
74 Regent 91.59% 90.01% 82
75 Albany 91.37% 89.05% 92
76 St. Thomas (MN) 91.20% 91.02% 73
77 Indiana (Maurer) 91.19% 91.11% 71
78 Colorado 91.15% 92.31% 57
79 Cardozo 90.96% 90.50% 76
80 Louisiana State 90.96% 89.23% 90
81 Texas Tech 90.91% 90.27% 78
82 Connecticut 90.83% 91.86% 64
83 Pittsburgh 90.66% 89.43% 87
84 Hofstra 90.62% 88.80% 96
85 Florida Int’l 90.55% 86.86% 112
86 New York Law School 90.54% 88.41% 99
87 Missouri-Kansas City 90.46% 90.25% 79
88 Loyola-L.A. 90.40% 88.88% 94
89 St. Louis 90.38% 89.24% 89
90 Georgia State 90.26% 89.54% 86
91 University of Arizona 90.24% 91.32% 69
92 Tulane 90.02% 89.95% 83
93 Drake 89.73% 90.56% 75
94 Dayton 89.64% 90.67% 74
95 Chapman 89.61% 92.19% 61
96 Tennessee 89.58% 89.67% 85
97 Northeastern 89.54% 89.18% 91
98 Richmond 89.36% 87.11% 111
99 Belmont 89.35% 88.26% 102
100 Miami 88.96% 84.55% 127
101 Wyoming 88.68% 87.80% 104
102 Univ. of Washington 88.63% 88.37% 100
103 Rutgers 88.46% 87.66% 105
104 Samford 88.44% 90.41% 77
105 UNLV 88.30% 92.06% 62
106 Brooklyn 88.24% 86.22% 116
107 South Texas 88.21% 83.08% 131
108 Seton Hall 88.11% 87.52% 106
109 Detroit Mercy 88.06% 87.29% 109
110 Akron 88.01% 86.64% 113
111 Howard 87.89% 86.26% 114
112 Pace 87.78% 85.89% 118
113 Maryland 87.73% 87.35% 107
114 Cincinnati 87.57% 91.04% 72
115 Northern Kentucky 87.47% 83.15% 129
116 West Virginia 87.15% 88.50% 98
117 Elon 86.91% 81.10% 138
118 Loyola-New Orleans 86.80% 84.48% 128
119 Maine 86.78% 89.91% 84
120 Case Western 86.57% 81.94% 133
121 Mississippi 86.35% 87.35% 108
122 Northern Illinois 85.89% 85.64% 120
123 Oregon 85.86% 84.70% 126
124 Indiana (McKinney) 85.81% 85.80% 119
125 Chicago-Kent 85.73% 85.13% 125
126 UC-San Francisco 85.70% 85.55% 122
127 Denver 85.49% 87.23% 110
128 Suffolk 85.42% 85.30% 124
129 American 84.90% 85.52% 123
130 Cleveland State 84.87% 86.25% 115
131 Arkansas-Fayetteville 84.69% 78.31% 150
132 Syracuse 84.43% 79.91% 145
133 Michigan State 84.33% 82.09% 132
134 Hawaii 83.51% 81.85% 134
135 Quinnipiac 83.45% 77.99% 153
136 New Mexico 83.23% 81.20% 136
137 Toledo 83.10% 80.75% 140
138 Arkansas-Little Rock 82.92% 80.57% 141
139 Louisville 82.89% 78.28% 152
140 Baltimore 82.56% 79.54% 146
141 Campbell 82.35% 81.65% 135
142 Idaho 82.35% 80.98% 139
143 Creighton 82.32% 77.56% 155
144 Memphis 81.85% 75.84% 161
145 Widener (DE) 81.64% 73.10% 175
146 Vermont 81.62% 75.98% 160
147 Lewis & Clark 81.52% 85.61% 121
148 Gonzaga 81.34% 80.56% 142
149 North Dakota 81.33% 73.14% 174
150 St. Mary’s 81.26% 78.29% 151
151 Touro 81.08% 77.28% 156
152 Ave Maria 81.05% 83.12% 130
153 Oklahoma City 80.84% 77.89% 154
154 Seattle 80.73% 80.43% 144
155 DePaul 80.51% 79.36% 148
156 Western State 80.21% 74.46% 169
157 Faulkner 80.14% 73.28% 173
158 New Hampshire 79.94% 80.54% 143
159 Pacific 79.12% 71.36% 178
160 Massachusetts 79.11% 81.14% 137
161 St. Thomas (FL) 79.07% 76.33% 159
162 Charleston 78.65% 74.22% 170
163 Mississippi College 78.61% 79.39% 147
164 Liberty 78.06% 76.34% 158
165 Roger Williams 77.43% 76.52% 157
166 Illinois-Chicago 77.25% 74.86% 167
167 Willamette 75.82% 78.81% 149
168 Western New England 75.78% 75.12% 165
169 Santa Clara 75.64% 71.24% 179
170 North Texas 75.39% 72.31% 176
171 Widener (PA) 75.35% 74.97% 166
172 Southern Illinois 75.09% 75.64% 163
173 Southwestern 74.60% 75.64% 164
174 Ohio Northern 74.58% 73.54% 172
175 Cal-Western 74.49% 71.47% 177
176 Appalachian 74.22% 75.79% 162
177 San Francisco 74.17% 68.84% 183
178 New England 74.04% 74.01% 171
179 Capital 73.71% 68.57% 184
180 District of Columbia 72.47% 69.30% 182
181 Mitchell | Hamline 72.21% 70.18% 181
182 Nova 71.01% 67.90% 185
183 Barry 70.99% 65.86% 188
184 Florida A&M 70.69% 66.84% 187
185 CUNY 70.38% 70.90% 180
186 Lincoln Memorial 70.34% 74.57% 168
187 North Carolina Central 67.42% 65.25% 189
188 Cooley 64.89% 62.97% 191
189 Texas Southern 61.90% 66.98% 186
190 John Marshall (GA) 59.75% 64.16% 190
191 Puerto Rico 54.89% 52.15% 193
192 Southern 54.21% 56.52% 192
193 Inter-American (PR) 50.22% 46.36% 194
194 Pontifical Catholic (PR) 32.32% 23.97% 195

2025-26 methodology:

Notes on Employment Rates

Due to enhanced ABA reporting rules, law schools must provide more information about the many types of employment that law graduates gain. Each year, schools are required to report to the ABA how many of their most recent graduates had various types of jobs lined up after graduation.

As in previous years, the ABA mandated that schools report law school and university positions separately from all other nonuniversity-funded positions to make the difference between the two types of jobs very clear. U.S. News continued to use this standard for data collection for the classes of 2022 and 2023 for 10 months after graduation, which is the ABA-required time frame. The ABA chose that 10-month time frame to provide enough time for J.D. graduates to take the bar exam in the state of their choosing, get results and look for a job.

These ABA standards require law schools to go into great detail by reporting 45 different job types, as well as employment status and duration. That includes, for example, whether each graduate’s employment was long term – defined as lasting at least a year – or short term, whether it was full or part time, and whether it required passage of a bar exam.

U.S. News collected these same statistics when schools were surveyed for the annual rankings and gathered the same data on members of the class who were employed 10 months after graduation. U.S. News also collected data on students’ jobs when the law school was unable to determine length of employment or full- or part-time status, as well as when employment status was unknown.

U.S. News incorporated this rich 10-months-after-graduation data into its computation of the employment measure for the classes of 2022 and 2023 at 10 months after graduation. Placement success was calculated by assigning various weights to the number of graduates employed in 45 of these different types of post-J.D. jobs, employment statuses and durations.

Full weight was given for graduates who had these 45 types of jobs. The 100% weighted jobs were those who had a full-time job that lasted at least a year and for which bar passage was required, or a full-time job that lasted at least a year where a J.D. degree was an advantage.

Plus, we give full weight to school-funded full-time, long-term fellowships where bar passage is required or where the J.D. degree is an advantage. We also give full weight to those enrolled in graduate studies in the ABA employment outcomes grid.

Less weight went to full-time, long-term jobs that were professional or nonprofessional and did not require bar passage, and to positions whose start dates were deferred. The lowest weight applied to jobs categorized as both part time and short term, and those jobs for which a law school was unable to determine length of employment or whether they were full time.

In terms of all law school and university positions, U.S. News continues to apply a discount for some law school-funded jobs which aren’t fully weighted in our rankings calculations.

These weighted employment figures were divided by the number of graduates, then used to produce a weighted employment value for the 2022 and 2023 graduating J.D. classes, and then averaged. They were used in the ranking formula only and are not published.

To reduce the year-to-year volatility in this indicator given the small sizes of some graduating J.D. classes, this 10-months-after-graduation indicator, for the second year in a row, was based on the average of the 2022 and 2023 graduating classes’ outcomes 10 months after graduation.

Actual rates for the other types of positions of each school’s latest graduating class of 2023 appear in the profiles.

Editor’s Note:  If you would like to receive a daily email with links to legal education posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Ad: TaxAnalysis Award of Distinction. Honoring those that have made outstanding contributions to the field of taxation.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading