Dean and Professor Andrew Perlman of Suffolk Law (but mostly Claude Fable 5 (Max)), Generative AI and the Future of Legal Scholarship (June 2026 Edition).

Dean Perlman shares a law review article generated by Claude Fable 5 (Max) in less than an hour based on the following prompt:

You are going to write a cutting-edge law review article on the future of legal scholarship in an AI world. It should contain a groundbreaking and persuasive theory that would be attractive to the most selective law reviews, and it should be written in the style and at the level of sophistication, depth and breadth that would be attractive to such law reviews. Write the article fully footnoted and make sure the citations are Bluebooked and carefully vetted to ensure accuracy. I want the argument to focus on a truly original conception of what scholarship will look like in the future, not merely finding new ways to authenticate or attest to existing methods. Make sure the footnotes are densely populated and cited at the frequency and level of sophistication of a top-tier submission.

Worth a read, no?