Continuing my coverage of the taxpayer's attempt to have the district court reconsider its decision in In re G-I Holdings, 369 B.R. 832 (D.N.J. 2007), based on affidavits to be supplied by Senate Finance Committee staffers on the meaning of a tax transition rule:  the taxpayer yesterday withdrew its motion to seal and simultaneously filed the affidavits of Mark Prater (Minority Chief Tax Counsel, Senate Finance Committee) and Brigitta Guyla Paru (former assistant to Mr. Prater):

• Taxpayer's Letter to Judge Chesler
• Revised Exhibit B to Offer of Proof

Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:

• Can Congressional Staff Testify on Meaning of Tax Law? (Apr. 20, 2009)
• Kysar: Transition Rules and Statutory Interpretation in G-I Holdings (Apr. 28, 2009)
• Government Files Brief in Opposition in G-I Holdings (Apr. 30, 2009)
• Government Opposes Sealing Finance Committee Staff Statements in G-I Holdings (May 1, 2009)