The Madisonian’s mobblog on What Kind of Institution Do We Want A Law School To Be? has come to an end, after a number of fascinating entries:

• Erwin Chemerinsky, A Law School for the 21st Century (4/6/08)
• Mike Madison, Law Schools and Law Firms (4/7/08)
• Nate Oman, “Doing What We Do Best” or “Why Law Professors Should Feel Less Guilt” (4/7/08)
• Alfred Brophy, A Mini University? (3/7/08)
• Nancy Rapoport, What Kind of Institution Do We Want a Law School To Be? (4/7/08)
• Nate Oman, Two Cheers For Indetured Servitude! (4/8/08)
• Mike Madison, Legal Education Questions (4/8/08)
• Alfred Yen, Coordinated Classes? (4/8/08)
• Ann Bartow, Some Musings About Possible Ways To Improve Law Reviews And Law Schools Simultaneously (4/8/08)
• Nancy Rapoport, What Kind of Faculty Would I Want in the Ideal Law School? (4/8/08)
• Deven Desai, Are Attorneys Generalists or Specialists? (4/8/08)
• Alfred Brophy, A Focus on Quality of Scholarship, Rather than Placement (4/8/08)
• Christine Hurt, The Perfect Law School (4/8/08)
• Rodney Smolla, Washington and Lee’s New Model (4/8/08)
• Dan Filler, Law School As Community  (4/8/08)
• Orly Lobel, Institutes of Excellence and the Global, Departmentalized Law School (4/8/08)
• Frank Pasquale, Learning How to Learn (4/8/08)
• Mike Madison, Too Many law Schools? (4/8/08)
• Frank Pasquale, Playing the Game/Changing the Game (4/9/08)
• Dan Filler, Single Sex Law Schools (4/9/08)
• Frank Pasquale, A Skeptical View of Education Reform (4/9/08)
• Deven Desai, Shaping a Vision (4/9/08)
• Alfred Brophy, The Economics of It All (With Some Funny Numbers) (4/9/08)
• Mike Madison, Gender and Race in Legal Education (4/10/08)
• Deven Desai, Education Gap (4/10/08)
• Jim Chen, Fidelity in translation (4/11/09)
• Mike Madison, Crunch Time (4/11/08)
• Rick Garnett, Institutional Pluralism (4/11/08)
• Orly Lobel, …Because Things Are Not So Bad the Way They Are…(on the Law Review Front) (4/11/08)
• Deven Desai, Renaissance Education (4/11/08)
• Deven Desai, Mobblog Wrap-Up (4/11/08)