Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Spitz: § 104(a)(2) Discriminates Against Women & Minorities

Spitz Ssrn_111 Laura Spitz (Colorado) has posted I Think, Therefore I Am; I Feel, Therefore I Am Taxed: Déscartes, Tort Reform, and the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act, 35 N.M. L. Rev. 429 (2005), on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

This symposium paper explores the intersection of tort law and tax law in the context of noneconomic, nonphysical personal injury claims, and asks whether the distinctions drawn in section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code make sense as a matter of tax law, tort law or anti-discrimination law. In concluding that they do not, the paper further asks whether the new Civil Rights Tax Relief Act eliminates or reduces the problems created by section 104(a)(2), and suggests that it does not. Both section 104(a)(2) and the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act are premised on the assumption that physical and nonphysical injuries should be compensated (and taxed) differently. The paper explores the philosophical history of the distinction between the mind and the body, and argues that a distinction between physical and nonphysical harm – for the purposes of law – is a destructive dualism that has the effect of discriminating against women and minorities.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

3 responses to “Spitz: § 104(a)(2) Discriminates Against Women & Minorities

  1. Roth & Company, P.C. Avatar

    WORLD ENDS; WOMEN, MINORITIES HARDEST HIT

    The Tax Prof calls attentian to a paper that says the tax law provision making non-physical personal injuries taxable -…

  2. Roth & Company, P.C. Avatar

    WORLD ENDS; WOMEN, MINORITIES HARDEST HIT

    The Tax Prof calls attentian to a paper that says the tax law provision making non-physical personal injuries taxable -…

  3. Roth & Company, P.C. Avatar

    WORLD ENDS; WOMEN, MINORITIES HARDEST HIT

    The Tax Prof calls attentian to a paper that says the tax law provision making non-physical personal injuries taxable -…

  4. Roth & Company, P.C. Avatar

    WORLD ENDS; WOMEN, MINORITIES HARDEST HIT

    The Tax Prof calls attentian to a paper that says the tax law provision making non-physical personal injuries taxable -…

  5. PointOfLaw Forum Avatar

    Legal academia at work

    Referencing the article described in this post at TaxProf, reader J.W.B. comments: “Think there’s a basis for treating damages for physical vs. nonphysical injuries differently? You must be a sexist and/or racist.”…

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading