Tom Bell continues his series on the U.S. News & World Report Law School Rankings with a post on Baylor Explains the Data it Reported for the USN&WR Rankings:
The available evidence indicates that Baylor got ranked based on median LSAT and GPA figures different from—and rather higher than—the figures that USN&WR asked for. How did that happen? I here relate the explanation that Baylor’s Associate Dean, Leah Jackson, recently sent to me.
Prior posts in Tom’s series:
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Why Is Florida #41 Rather Than #43?
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Baylor & U.S. News Respond to Data Mix-up
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: LSAT and GPA Rankings
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Why Is Baylor #51 Rather Than #58?
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Z-Scores
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Accuracy of the Model
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: The Role of ABA Data
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Why Model the Rankings?
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Reverse Engineering the Rankings
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Winners & Losers in Use of Reported Median LSATs & GPAs
- Bell on the U.S. News Law School Rankings: Student Quality
