a surfer in front of the malibu pier on a sunny day

Paul L. Caron
Dean
Pepperdine Caruso
School of Law

headshot
Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more
  • Extreme Makeover: Taxpayer Edition

    Monday, July 5, 2004

    As noted earlier on TaxProf Blog, ABC’s tax lawyers have taken an aggressive position in telling recipients of home makeovers that they can avoid tax on the value of the improvements by characterizing the items as short term rental payments within the meaning of Code section 280A(g). The local paper has a front page story (complete with some great pictures) on the tax treatment of a San Diego family who had their 1200 square foot home expanded by ABC into a 4600 square foot behemoth:

    [T]he families in the program are “renting” their houses to the production company during the frenetic renovation. A long-standing tax provision allows homes to be rented for less than 15 days a year with no tax consequences, and with improvements voluntarily made during that period by the tenant considered to have no value to the owner.

    La Jolla tax attorney Cris John Wenthur called that reasoning “incredible” and predicted “Extreme Makeover” families may face skeptical IRS agents or have to battle out their cases in tax court. “It falls within the letter of the law,” he said. “Does it fall within the spirit of the law or is it a sham?” If the 15-day rent and improvement rule doesn’t stand, he estimated [the homeowner’s] 2004 state and federal tax bill would be an additional $200,000 or more, if the value of new construction, the building permit fees, new furnishings and landscaping were all considered taxable….

    A spokesman for the IRS said no ruling has been issued on tax implications facing “Extreme Makeover” households and advised participants to seek advice from tax attorneys and CPAs. Now that would be a great spinoff: “Extreme Makeover: Taxpayer Edition.”

    For prior TaxProf Blog coverage of this issue, see here, here, and here.

  • Sugin on Tax and John Rawls

    Monday, July 5, 2004

    Linda Sugin (Fordham) has posted Theories of Distributive Justice and Limitations on Taxation: What Rawls Demands from Tax Systems on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

    In The Myth of Ownership, Liam Murphy and Thomas Nagel offer a devastating critique of traditional tax policy analysis and its partial justice orientation, and demand that taxation be evaluated as part of a broader overall scheme of economic justice. This paper, presented as part of Fordham Law School’s conference on Rawls and the Law, considers how to approach tax policy in light of their analysis, and how to understand what John Rawls’ theory of justice requires of a system of taxation under that approach. It argues that the connection between taxes and justice is less specific than we might hope, and that theories of justice generally do not endorse particular tax policies, but are more likely to preclude them. Rather than searching in theories of justice for required precepts of taxation, we might more fruitfully ask what constraints, if any, a particular theory of justice imposes on the tax system. By applying this approach to Rawls’ ideas about taxation, his endorsement of a flat consumption-based tax, which is quite puzzling in light of much of what Rawls wrote about economic justice, can be better understood. If we read Rawls’ discussion of economic justice to offer limitations, rather than mandates, then a wide variety of tax systems may be part of a just Rawlsian society, and Rawls’ first principle of justice, which concerns political rights, imposes more significant limitations on systems of taxation than does his second principle, even though the second principle explicitly concerns economic rights.

  • New D.C. Declaration of Independence

    Sunday, July 4, 2004

    Photo of Sample DC PlateOn this July 4th, check out the new D.C. Declaration of Independence: D.C. Vote — Working to Secure Democracy for Washington, D.C., reports that “tens of thousands” of these Taxation Without Representation License Plates have cropped up on cars all over D.C.

  • Lithovski on Gregory and the History of Tax Avoidance Litigation

    Sunday, July 4, 2004

    Assaf Likhovski (Tel Aviv) has published The Duke and the Lady: Helvering v. Gregory and the History of Tax Avoidance Adjudication, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 953 (2004). Here is the abstract from SSRN:

    Tax avoidance is one of the major problems that every tax system faces. Courts play an important role in fighting tax avoidance, but the scope of judicial intervention in tax avoidance schemes varies. Certain courts and judges adopt a more passive and formalist attitude to tax avoidance while other courts pursue a more active, substantive approach. What factors influence judicial attitudes to tax avoidance? The article seeks to answer this question by examining the history of one specific landmark case, Helvering v. Gregory, decided by Judge Learned Hand in 1934.

    The article examines the legal, cultural and political factors that influenced Hand’s decision. It argues that one major factor that led Judge Hand to decide the way he did was the immediate political context in which the case was decided: In the months and weeks prior to the decision, tax avoidance by the rich had become a major political issue and public opinion was captivated by scandalous revelations about the tax avoidance schemes of a group of leading industrialists and bankers, chief among whom was Andrew Mellon, former Secretary of the Treasury. Using the story of Gregory as a case-study, the article shows that only a comprehensive historical approach which takes account of internal doctrinal developments as well as the influence of culture and politics can explain the history of tax avoidance adjudication.

  • Tribe Compares Iraqi Torture to Tax

    Saturday, July 3, 2004

    Showing once again that there is a tax angle to virtually everything, Laurence Tribe (Harvard) in an op-ed in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal compares Iraqi torture to tax: “[America’s world image is hurt] by Justice Department memoranda cynically dissecting the laws banning torture with a sensibility better suited to the parsing of tax-code loopholes than to the treatment of human beings.”

  • Tax Prof Spotlight: Pat Dilley

    Saturday, July 3, 2004

    Photo of Professor DilleyPat Dilley (Florida) was a late comer to the Tax Prof world, having pursued careers in history teaching and then in government before even going to law school. She has made up for lost time and established herself as an important tax academic, producing major scholarly work in the social security and pension areas while teaching in one of America’s leading graduate tax programs.

    Pat was raised in Tennessee, but her education is largely Pennsylvanian – Swarthmore College (BA 1973), and then the University of Pennsylvania (MA, history 1976). She left the PhD program at Penn when it became clear there were no jobs teaching history anywhere in the continental US, and entered government service, in the legislative policy office of the Social Security Administration, in Baltimore. From there, her government career took her to D.C., to the Office of the Secretary of HHS, where she was the budget examiner for SSA, and then to Capitol Hill in March, 1981, to the staff of the House Ways and Means Committee, where she worked on the Social Security Subcommittee staff until late 1987, serving as Staff Director/Chief Counsel of the Subcommittee from 1985-1987. “I was very lucky to be at Ways and Means during the 1980’s,” Pat says, “because I got to work on all the big Social Security, budget and tax bills – the 1983 Social Security refinancing bill, the Retirement Equity Act of 1984, the 1984 Social Security disability bill, the big budget bills of 1985 and 1986, and of course the 1986 Tax Reform Act, where I was part of the ‘pension team’.” During that time, she attended Georgetown University Law Center part-time, earning her J.D. degree in 1986 “and without having a nervous break-down!” Pat notes. “I didn’t have many classmates who worked all day, went to class from 5:30 to 8:00 pm and then went back to work.”

    Pat left the Hill in 1987 to try private practice, first at Arnold & Porter in D.C., and then at Downs, Rachlin & Martin in Vermont, from 1989-1993, earning her LLM in Taxation from Boston University, also part-time, in 1993 (“I’ve seen enough of Logan Airport to last me a lifetime, commuting to Boston from Burlington once a week for three years,” she says.) Pat finally had enough of time sheets, and began teaching at the then-University of Puget Sound School of Law – now Seattle University School of Law. Pat visited at the University of Florida Graduate Tax Program in 1997, and accepted a permanent offer from Florida in 1998, where she continues to teach income tax, corporate tax and pensions and deferred compensation in the JD and LLM programs.

    Pat has published a number of works in disparate areas of tax and benefit law, covering a wide range of subjects from entitlement in Social Security to bankruptcy and pensions to self-employment taxes. Her publications include:

    Leverage, Linkage and Leakage: Problems with the Private Pension System and How They Should Inform the Social Security Debate, 58 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1369 (2002) (with Norman Stein)

    Taking Public Rights Private: The Rhetoric and Reality of Social Security Privatization, 41 B.C. L. Rev. 975 (2000)

    Breaking the Glass Slipper – Reflections on the Self-Employment Tax, 54 Tax Law. 65 (2000)

    Hidden in Plain View: The Pension Shield Against Creditors, 74 Ind. L.J. 355 (1999)

    The Evolution of Entitlement: Retirement Income and the Problem of Integrating Private Pensions and Social Security, 30 Loy.L.A. L. Rev. 1063 (1997)

    Pat is a frequent speaker at AALS and ABA functions, and is interviewed regularly in the mainstream media. She notes, “I felt I had finally achieved true success in my doctor brother’s eyes when he called to say he’d heard me being interviewed by Nina Totenberg on Morning Edition a couple of years ago – now, that’s celebrity!” She also does consulting and expert witness work, mainly in the area of the treatment of pension plans in bankruptcy proceedings, which she refers to as “the Bermuda Triangle of bankruptcy law”. Pat recently became co-editor of the on-line Social Science Research Network journal Social Security, Pensions and Retirement Income.

    “My scholarship and my teaching are still grounded in my experiences writing tax and Social Security law on the Hill, and indeed from executive branch in SSA and HHS before I went to Ways and Means,” Pat says. “I remember the process of developing good law as intensely collaborative, and I try to convey that to my students as they struggle to understand the statute and its operation in the real world. I have very fond memories of working with Ward Hussey, Larry Filson, John Buckley and others at the House Legislative Counsel’s office, trying to write statutory language that did exactly what we intended, no more and no less. Of course, we didn’t always achieve the level of precision we would have liked, given the time pressures we were under.” Pat particularly remembers the month the staff was given in August, 1986, to draft the final version of theTax Reform Act of 1986 – “I had just finished taking the bar exam, and returned to work to a day and night process of trying to get the drafting done on the pension provisions – even with 10 or more people working more than full time on perfecting those provisions, mistakes were bound to happen. That probably explains how we managed to essentially repeal the estate tax with an ESOP provision, something that was quickly corrected in the next session of Congress!”

    She tries to convey a sense of this process to her tax students, as a way of impressing on them the importance of paying attention to every word in the statute and in regulations. “I feel very strongly that we have a responsibility to our students, and to the profession of law, to prepare young lawyers to really be professionals, to understand what it means to hold the lives and fortunes of their clients in their hands. In tax, in particular, I feel so lucky to be a part of the Florida tax program, where we get graduate students full time for a year and subject them, and ourselves, to a kind of immersion program in tax, so that they’re really prepared to be tax lawyers when they emerge. It’s very rewarding to hear back from them years later about how they are using every day what they learned from us.”

    Pat has become an avid golfer since moving to Florida (“I’m not very good yet, but I love it anyway!”), and spends the rest of her free time sewing quilts and throwing Frisbees for her two Border Terriers Sophie and Ty. “My mother still hopes I’ll finish my PhD some day, but I think four degrees should be enough for anybody.” Pat says. “But maybe someday I can still produce my long-planned historical novel about my mother’s Kentucky ancestors, who knows!”

    Each Saturday, TaxProf Blog shines the spotlight on one of the 700+ tax professors in America’s law schools. We hope to help bring the many individual stories of scholarly achievements, teaching innovations, public service, and career moves within the tax professorate to the attention of the broader tax community. Please email me suggestions for future Tax Prof Profiles. For prior Tax Prof Profiles, see here.

  • New Book on Land Value Taxation in Britain

    Saturday, July 3, 2004

    Image of Book CoverOwen Connellan has published Land Value Taxation in Britain: Experience and Opportunities (Lincoln Institute of Law & Policy, 2004). The book resurrects the idea of a land value tax:

    Land Value Taxation (LVT) is the policy of raising revenues by charging each landholder a portion of the value of unimproved land. The tax may be justified for both economic (because it does not distort market mechanisms) and fairness (because it is equivalent to a fee for protection of land ownership) reasons. It is a cheap (and therefore efficient) tax to administer because much less effort is required to track land ownership than to track income or sales transactions. LVT was an important part of the platform of the British Liberal Party and was advocated by Winston Churchill early in his career.

    Here is the abstract of the book:

    Attempts at introducing land value taxation (LVT) in the United Kingdom demonstrate a long and varied history. Land Value Taxation in Britain considers this history and how LVT may be particularly relevant at the present time. Owen Connellan, with contributing authors Nathaniel Lichfield, Frances Plimmer and Tony Vickers, explores past debate over different forms of LVT, the tax’s role in generating government revenue, and its practical operation, moral background and ethical rationale. The book concludes with a discussion of future prospects for LVT in Britain and elsewhere.

    But why study land value taxation in Britain, especially when that country has yet to evolve a system of LVT that is generally accepted or workable? Britain’s experience with property taxation and expertise on property valuation make it an ideal case study. Only by examining the success and failure of past legislative and administrative attempts to employ LVT for the benefit of the community can policy makers draft more effective LVT proposals, not just in the U.K. and but also in other countries.

  • July 13 Forum on Fixing the Tax Mess

    Friday, July 2, 2004

    The Tax Policy Center will host a forum on Fixing the Tax Mess: Prospects and Possibilities on Tuesday, July 13 in Washington, D.C. The speakers are:

    • Tax Prof Michael Graetz (Yale): Replacing the income tax with a value-added tax, while retaining a version of the AMT limited to families with more than $100,000 of income
    Steny Hoyer (D-MD), House Democratic Whip: Initial conclusions from his ongoing examination of the tax system, possible ways to reform it, and the political prospects for change
    Peter Orszag (Brookings Institution), Co-Director, Tax Policy Center: Moderator
    C. Eugene Steuerle (Urban Institute), Co-Director, Tax Policy Center: The need to reform the tax policy process itself

    The forum will be held at 9:30 – 11:00 am at the Urban Institute’s Katharine Graham Conference Center, 2100 M Street, NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC. To RSVP, e-mail here or call (202) 261-5627.

  • 1,500 Taxpayers Come Clean in Son of Boss Tax Shelters

    Friday, July 2, 2004

    The IRS announced that over 1,500 taxpayers have taken advantage of its amensty program in Announcement 2004-46 (previously blogged here) and come clean about their investments in Son of Boss tax shelters. For press reports, see here. (Thanks to Fred Harris (Illinois) for the tip.)

TaxProf Blog delivers timely, insightful coverage of tax law and legal education to inform, connect, and inspire scholars, practitioners, and students.

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Ad: TaxAnalysis Award of Distinction. Honoring those that have made outstanding contributions to the field of taxation.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog