Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Rousey v. Jacaway

Monday, June 7, 2004

The U.S. Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Rousey v. Jacoway (No. 03-1407), which raises the important issue of whether federal bankruptcy law protects IRAs from creditors. The 8th Circuit ruled that IRAs are unlike pensions and annuities and thus not protected in bankruptcy.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

One response to “Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Rousey v. Jacaway”

  1. Stuart Levine Avatar
    Stuart Levine

    My understanding was that Federal law did not exempt IRAs from the claims of bankruptcy creditors, but that the states could enact exemptions that would be honored in a bankruptcy proceeding. That has been the case in Maryland, where there is a specific state exemption for IRAs. (Note, however, that the drafting of the statute has been found wanting, since it is unclear whether contributions in excess of tax-deductible amounts are protected and whether rollovers from qualified plans are protected. I will try to get a better fix on this issue from some of my bankruptcy law colleagues.)

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading