Following up on my prior posts:
- Newton: How Law Profs' Preoccupation with 'Impractical Scholarship' Obstructs Legal Education Reform (Aug. 23, 2010)
- Garnett: 'Preaching What They Don't Practice' (Aug. 27, 2010)
Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Are Law School Faculties Part of the Problem With Legal Education?:
It’s often struck us as an obvious question: how can law schools provide better real-world training to students when their faculties are made up of article-writing academics?
- Jonathan Adler (Case Western), Do Law Schools Seek the 'Wrong Stuff' (Volokh Conspiracy)
- Stephen Bainbridge (UCLA), The Wrong Stuff: What Law Schools Value in Law Prof Candidates (ProfessorBainbridge.com)
- Bruce Carton, Should Law School Be More Than Just a 'Sorting Mechanism' for Potential Employers? (Legal Blog Watch)
- Scott Greenfield, A Skunk in the Ivory Tower (Simple Justice)
- Kristen Holmquist (UC-Berkeley), Law School and Lawyering (PrawfsBlawg)
- Paul Horwitz (Alabama), Form and Substance in the Reform of American Legal Education (PrawfsBlawg)
- Eric Lipman, Two-Track Legal Education Coming to a Law School Near You? (Legal Blog Watch)
- Jason Mazzone (Brooklyn), Thoughts on Legal Education (Balkinization)
- Karen Sloan, Professor: Ivory Tower Faculty Undermines Practical Legal Education (National Law Journal)
