Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Smith: Gaps in the 7th Circuit’s Innocent Spouse Opinion in Lantz

Tax AnalystsFollowing up on last week's post, Tax Court Refuses to Follow 7th Circuit, Again Invalidates Innocent Spouse Reg (Sept. 23, 2010):  Patrick J. Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), Gaps in the Seventh Circuit's Reasoning in Lantz128 Tax Notes 1375 (Sept. 27, 2010):

Last year the Tax Court invalidated an IRS regulation [Reg. § 1.6015-5(b)(1)] that imposed a two-year time limit on claims for equitable innocent spouse relief [I.R.C. § 6015(f)], based on the rationale that Congress acted intentionally when it imposed the two-year time limit on other types of innocent spouse relief but not on equitable claims for relief. [Lantz v. Commissioner, 132 T.C. No. 8 (Apr. 7, 2009).]  The Seventh Circuit reversed the Tax Court on this issue. [Lantz v. Commissioner, 607 F.3d 479 (7th Cir. 2010).] Significant gaps in the reasoning of the Seventh Circuit opinion raise serious questions about the correctness of its holding.

All Tax Analysts content is available through the LexisNexis® services.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Ad: TaxAnalysis Award of Distinction. Honoring those that have made outstanding contributions to the field of taxation.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading