Forbes, Risk Or Revolution: Will AI Replace Lawyers?:
As artificial intelligence reshapes many industries, the legal field faces its own crossroads. Over the past few years, a growing number of legal professionals have embraced AI tools to boost efficiency and reduce costs. According to recent figures, nearly 73% of legal experts now plan to incorporate AI into their daily operations. 65% of law firms agree that "effective use of generative AI will separate the successful and unsuccessful law firms in the next five years."
Investors have shown strong support for AI-powered legal startups, with funding reaching new record highs in 2024 with total capital investment of $477 million. The appeal for VCs is the potential that 44% of legal work could potentially be automated by emerging AI tools. Startups like Harvey, raised a $100 million Series C round at a $1.5 billion valuation.
We explore the current state of legal automation with Ben Su, Co-founder and Head of Growth of Capita, the world’s first AI lawyer, and discuss how this shift towards AI could reshape the delivery of legal services. Carey Lening, a legal-tech consultant and “recovering” attorney who focuses on privacy and data protection and Jide Afolabi, a probate lawyer, a graduate of Osgoode Law School with over 20 years of experience weigh in on the promises and pitfalls of automation in the legal sector. What are the challenges and criticism facing this change? What are its effects on legal education? What will AI might mean for the future of work? …
Rethinking Legal Education And Professional Development
One of the more challenging issues raised by the shift toward AI in legal services is the role of legal education.
Su shares his own experience as a law student who, despite strong academic performance, struggled to secure a position after graduation. He criticizes the traditional approach, where the burden of unpaid labor falls on those just starting their careers. “I think the current system is extremely unfair,” Su remarks, noting that law students are often exploited to provide free labor for law firms.
He challenges the apprenticeship model: " By introducing AI into legal services, there is the potential to reduce the workload on young lawyers and offer more balanced opportunities. With AI handling routine tasks, junior legal staff might have more time to engage in meaningful work that adds real value for clients "
Lening reflects on the evolution of legal education and the impact of technology and acknowledges that while the traditional law school experience, including the Socratic method, can be challenging, it serves a valuable purpose. Lening explains, "It does force you in a very consistent way to think differently about problems, to break things down into discrete things. You learn how to analogize better. You learn how to craft your thoughts in a way that becomes extremely useful and becomes a valuable skill."
However, she advises prospective law students to be more strategic about their decision to pursue a legal education. She states, "I would tell people wanting to go into law school to be far more strategic about why." She emphasizes that the days of entering law school simply because one can’t figure out what else to do are over, noting, "It has changed from being a thing that you can do–get out of–and still be fine to something that you really do need to evaluate a little bit more because you happen to test well and you like to argue."
Lening also highlights the changing landscape of the legal profession due to technological advancements. She suggests that these changes will lead to new applications of law degrees, stating, "What these tools and what technology and what the law changes in general are going to continue to manifest is that people are going to be using their law degrees in different ways, in new ways."
Lening calls for updated curricula, emphasizing "Law schools teach analytical thinking, but graduates need technical literacy too. Future lawyers must learn to audit AI outputs, design prompts, and collaborate with engineers." She suggests that while significant changes are happening, many of these shifts have already been underway for some time, and observes, "I think that the existing model that we all, conceptually, have in our minds about working in a big shoe law firm and becoming partner has already started to shift." The traditional career trajectory in prestigious law firms is no longer as straightforward or guaranteed as it once was. However, she acknowledges that there will always be a market for top-tier law firms, noting, "… because people like paying for exclusivity and for what they think is the best."
Editor's Note: If you would like to receive a daily email with links to legal education posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.
