Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

Rauh & Jaros: It Failed in France. It Would Be a Disaster in California.

In the New York Times, Joshua Rauh (Stanford Hoover Institute) and Benjamin Jaros (Stanford Hoover Institute) have published a guest essay titled, “It Failed in France. It Would Be a Disaster in California.” From the piece:

To many, the 5 percent wealth tax on California’s ballot this year may sound like a harmless way to raise money, a proposal only billionaires would dislike. Yet leaders from across the political spectrum oppose the plan, including Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, the California Teachers Association and Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat.

The critics are right. A quick look at the math underpinning the proposal, which would tax the accumulated assets of ultrawealthy Californians, shows that the first net wealth tax in modern U.S. history would provide the state little and endanger its economic core.

Other countries have made the same mistake Californians are being tempted to commit. In 1990, 12 industrialized countries levied a wealth tax. By 2025, nine had repealed theirs — including Denmark, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands and France. These nations discovered that wealth taxes are hard to carry out, cause wealthy people to move and take their money elsewhere and raise far less tax revenue than promised.

More from TaxProf Blog:


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading