Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. -Accomplish hours of research in seconds -Instantly draft high-quality communications -Verify answers using a library of trusted tax content. Learn more

IRS Rules Unforeseen Circumstances Justified TP’s Move Within 2 Years for § 121 Purposes

Tax_analysts_28 Irs_logo_37 The IRS ruled in LTR 2005-04-012 (Oct. 14, 2004) (also available on the Tax Analysts web site as Doc 2005-1782, 2005 TNT 19-23) that an individual who lived in his primary residence for fewer than two years nevertheless could exclude the maximum allowable amount of gain from the sale of his home under § 121 based on these unforeseen circumstances:

TP completed a test in order to compete for a position within the K-9 unit of TP’s police force. The K-9 unit represents only 3% of the entire police force and very few officers are selected to train for a position within the K-9 unit. After TP and Spouse started using the Townhouse as their principal residence, TP received notification that TP was selected to become a K-9 officer. According to TP’s supplemental representations, a K-9 officer is required to care for a dog and maintain a 6 foot by 9 foot kennel at the officer’s residence. The homeowners association for TP’s townhouse does not permit its residents to maintain a kennel. Consequently, TP and Spouse sold the Townhouse before they had owned and used the property as their principal residence for 2 years.


About the Author

Ad: BlueJ Better Tax Answers. Blue J's generative AI tax research solution is transforming how tax experts work. Learn more.
Information and rates on advertising on TaxProf Blog

One response to “IRS Rules Unforeseen Circumstances Justified TP’s Move Within 2 Years for § 121 Purposes”

  1. Shag from Brookline Avatar
    Shag from Brookline

    Does this mean that tax policy has gone to the dogs? Doggonit!
    What if the pressure to sell had come from T’s new employment for purposes other than a doghouse, such as the need to entertain customers, etc, in a larger, better located home that would better serve the employer’s image?

Discover more from TaxProf Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading